Gawron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gawron v. State

597 So. 2d 340, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4365

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 1992

DocketNos. 90-03430, 90-03431

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 597 So. 2d 340 (Gawron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gawron v. State, 597 So. 2d 340, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4365 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

We find merit only in Gawron’s argument that he was improperly ordered to pay $100 to the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund without being afforded adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. Siplin v. State, 584 So.2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, we strike the $100 without prejudice to the state to seek to reimpose this cost after giving Gawron proper notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Gawron’s judgments and sentences are affirmed, but the $100 cost is stricken.

PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI