Gavril v. Sunset Auto Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gavril v. Sunset Auto Co.

861 S.W.2d 830, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1537, 1993 WL 387203

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1993·No. No. 63209·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Claimant appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), modifying the award of an Administrative Law Judge and awarding him $11,778.15. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by substantial and competent evidence and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this [831]*831order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Claimant appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), modifying the award of an Administrative Law Judge and awarding him $11,778.15. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by substantial and competent evidence and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this [831]*831order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gavril v. Sunset Auto Co., 861 S.W.2d 830, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1537, 1993 WL 387203 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 830 (Gavril v. Sunset Auto Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.