Gavlak v. Town of Somers

Second Circuit

Gavlak v. Town of Somers

184 F. App'x 32

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 23, 2006·No. No. 05-4748-cv·Published

Opinion

[33]*33SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs David Gavlak and Hillside Springs Farm, Inc., appeal from an August 2, 2005 judgment of the District Court dismissing all claims against defendants Town of Somers and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals on the basis of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history. Substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, we conclude that summary judgment for defendants was appropriate for all the claims in the complaint. We have carefully considered all of plaintiffs’ arguments and find them without merit. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED and the pending motion to supplement the record is hereby DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[33]*33SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs David Gavlak and Hillside Springs Farm, Inc., appeal from an August 2, 2005 judgment of the District Court dismissing all claims against defendants Town of Somers and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals on the basis of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history. Substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, we conclude that summary judgment for defendants was appropriate for all the claims in the complaint. We have carefully considered all of plaintiffs’ arguments and find them without merit. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED and the pending motion to supplement the record is hereby DENIED as moot.

Gavlak v. Town of Somers, 184 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2006).

Pincite

184 F. App'x 32 (Gavlak v. Town of Somers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.