Gavin, M. & Carezani, L. v. Loeffelbein, E.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 28, 2017·No. 382 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 74 MAP 2017

MONICA GAVIN AND LUCIA CAREZANI, : No. 382 MAL 2017 EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF : JAMES GAVIN, DECEASED, :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Superior Court : :

v. :

: :

ELAINE LOEFFELBEIN, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issues rephrased for clarity and set forth below: 1. Did the Superior Court err by holding emergency guardianship orders automatically expire? 2. Did the Superior Court err by holding that the rebuttable presumption that an incapacitated person is unable to engage in financial transactions is inapplicable to a person under the protection of an emergency guardian who has been appointed for the person and his estate?

Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gavin, M. & Carezani, L. v. Loeffelbein, E., (Pa. 2017).

Gavin, M. & Carezani, L. v. Loeffelbein, E. (Gavin, M. & Carezani, L. v. Loeffelbein, E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.