Gavers v. State
901 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6787, 2005 WL 1108844
Opinion
Gary Stetson Gavers appeals his final judgment of conviction and sentence. We affirm the judgment, but remand this cause to the trial court to correct the written order of probation at which Gavers need not be present. The order should reflect that Gavers was found guilty by reason of a jury verdict and did not enter a [381]*381guilty plea or a plea of no contest. See, e.g., Hepburn v. State, 780 So.2d 326, 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gavers v. State, 901 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6787, 2005 WL 1108844 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
901 So. 2d 380 (Gavers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hepburn v. State
780 So. 2d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)