Gavaghen v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gavaghen v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.

12 A.D.2d 511, 208 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6976

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 511 (Gavaghen v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gavaghen v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc., 12 A.D.2d 511, 208 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by third-party plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of the third-party defendant, from so much of an order as disallows the latter’s proposed amendments to the record on appeal. Motion denied, on condition that the third-party defendant perfect the appeal for the January Term, beginning January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The appeal will be heard on a separate record. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before December 14, 1960. Motion by the third-party plaintiff to dispense with the printing of all the exhibits on the appeal from the judgment, granted conditionally, as follows: The movant may dispense with the printing of plaintiff’s exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4, and defendant’s exhibits A, B, C, D and E, on condition that one photostatic copy of exhibits B, C, D and E be served, together with the record, upon the third-party defendant, and that, as to all the exhibits which are not printed, the originals or photostatic copies shall be submitted to the court upon the argument or submission of the appeal. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by third-party plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of the third-party defendant, from so much of an order as disallows the latter’s proposed amendments to the record on appeal. Motion denied, on condition that the third-party defendant perfect the appeal for the January Term, beginning January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The appeal will be heard on a separate record. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before December 14, 1960. Motion by the third-party plaintiff to dispense with the printing of all the exhibits on the appeal from the judgment, granted conditionally, as follows: The movant may dispense with the printing of plaintiff’s exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4, and defendant’s exhibits A, B, C, D and E, on condition that one photostatic copy of exhibits B, C, D and E be served, together with the record, upon the third-party defendant, and that, as to all the exhibits which are not printed, the originals or photostatic copies shall be submitted to the court upon the argument or submission of the appeal. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 511, 208 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gavaghen-v-psaty-fuhrman-inc-nyappdiv-1960.