Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority

304 F. Supp. 736, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10211
District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided July 1, 1969·No. Civ. A. 66 C 1459·Published·Cited by 64 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

AUSTIN, District Judge.

This matter coming on to be heard pursuant to this Court’s Memorandum Opinion of February 10, 1969, D.C., 296 F.Supp. 907, and Orders entered on such date denying defendants’ motions for summary judgment, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to Count II of the Complaint, and granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to Count I of the Complaint, and

The Court having conferred with counsel for the parties and having determined that the several provisions of this judgment order are necessary to prohibit the future use and to remedy the past effects of the defendant Chicago Housing Authority’s unconstitutional site selection and tenant assignment procedures, to the end that plaintiffs and the class of persons represented by them, Negro tenants of and applicants for public housing in Chicago, shall have the full equitable relief to which they are entitled,

It is hereby ordered:

I. For purposes-of this judgment order,
A. “CHA” shall mean the defendant, Chicago Housing Authority.
B. “Dwelling Unit” shall mean an apartment or single family residence which is to be initially made available to and occupied by a low-income, non-elderly family, subsequent to the date hereof, directly or indirectly by or through CHA, whether in a structure owned in whole or in part by CHA (whether or not newly constructed) or to be otherwise made available for occupancy by or through CHA to such a family. “Dwelling Units” include “Leased Dwelling Units” as hereinafter defined.
C. “Leased Dwelling Unit” shall mean a Dwelling Unit in a structure leased or partially leased by CHA from any person, firm or corporation.
D. “Limited Public Housing Area” shall mean that part of the County of Cook in the State of Illinois which lies either within census tracts of the United States Bureau of the Census having 30% or more non-white population, or within a distance of one mile from any point on the outer perimeter of any such census tract. “General Public Housing Area” shall mean the remaining párt of the County of Cook in the State of Illinois. The terms “non-white” and “white” shall have the meaning given to such terms by the United States Bureau of the Census.
For purposes of this subsection D, results of the 1970 and each subsequent census taken by the United States Bureau of the Census shall presumptively determine the non-white population of census tracts until results of a subsequent such census are officially published; provided, that any party may, on motion, offer evidence as to the non-white population of any census tract for the purpose of rebutting such presumption; and provided further, that Dwelling Units located or proposed to be located in any census tract subsequent ■ to official .publication of the results of the last previous such census shall be taken into account in determining the population of such census tract, and for such purpose it shall be assumed that such Dwelling Units will be occupied by non-whites at the rate of two persons per bedroom.
For the period from the date hereof until the official publication of such 1970 census results, the census tracts in the City of Chicago listed on Ex *738 hibit A, attached hereto, shall be presumed to have 30% or more non-white population; and, subject to evidence offered on motion by either party, the non-white population of census tracts in the County of Cook outside of the City of Chicago shall be presumed to be as stated in the 1960 census of the United States Bureau of the Census. E. “Public Housing Project” shall mean any thirteen or more Dwelling Units which are located (1) in the same structure, (2) on the same lot or parcel of real estate, or (3) on two or more lots or parcels of real estate which are contiguous to one another, or are separated only by streets, alleys, bodies of water, railroad tracks or the like.
II. Following the date of this judgment order CHA shall not authorize, approve or implement any plan for Dwelling Units, nor shall CHA seek any approval or request or accept any assistance from any government agency with respect thereto (including without limitation approval of the acquisition of any interest in real estate), unless such plan affirmatively requires that,
A. All Dwelling Units provided for in such plan shall be located in conformity with the provisions of Article III hereof, and
B. The activities to be performed in order to render such Dwelling Units available for occupancy (whether construction, purchase, rehabilitation, leasing or otherwise) shall take place at such times as will result in the location of such Dwelling Units in conformity with the provisions of Article III hereof.
III. Following the date of this judgment order CHA shall provide Dwelling Units as follows, and not otherwise:
A. The following Dwelling Units may be made available for occupancy without restriction imposed by this order:
(1) The 1458 Dwelling Units provided for by pending CHA projects Ill. 2-27, 2-28 (exclusive of Dwelling Units proposed to be located at 70th and Harper streets in the City of Chicago), 2-32, 2-33, 2-51, 2-64, 2-69 and 2-74.
(2) Leased Dwelling Units (but not more than two per structure) which have been occupied for at least six months prior to CHA’s leasing the same by tenants wHtii continue in occupancy following CHA’s leasing thereof.
B. CHA shall not commence or cause to be commenced the construction of any Dwelling Units, other than said 1458 Dwelling Units referred to in Subsection A of this Article III, until CHA shall have commenced or caused to be commenced, and shall be continuing or shall have completed, the construction of not less than 700 Dwelling Units located in the General Public Housing Area of the City of Chicago.
C. Subject to the provisions of Sub-shall not commence or cause to be commenced the construction of. any Dwelling Units in any Limited Public Housing Area, other than said 1458 Dwelling Units referred to in Subsection A of this Article III, unless within three months following such commencement of construction at least 75% of the Dwelling Units on which CHA shall have commenced or caused to have commenced construction, and shall have continued or completed construction, since the commencement of construction of the last of the 700 Dwelling Units referred to in subsection B of this Article III shall have been located (at the time of commencement of construction thereof) in the General Public Housing Area of the City of Chicago.
D. Subject to the provisions of subsection E of this Article III, no Leased Dwelling Unit shall be made available for occupancy in the Limited Public Housing Area of the City of Chicago (in addition to Leased Dwelling Units in such Area which are already occupied) unless, immediately following such occupancy, at least 75% of the Leased Dwelling Units then oc *739

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority, 304 F. Supp. 736, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10211 (N.D. Ill. 1969).

304 F. Supp. 736 (Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority
475 F.3d 845 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
Gautreaux v. Pierce
690 F.2d 616 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Gautreaux v. Pierce
548 F. Supp. 1294 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
Alschuler v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
686 F.2d 472 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Alschuler v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
515 F. Supp. 1212 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
Morris v. Chicago Housing Authority
500 F. Supp. 763 (N.D. Illinois, 1980)
Gautreaux v. Landrieu
498 F. Supp. 1072 (N.D. Illinois, 1980)
Constructors Assoc. of Western PA. v. Kreps
441 F. Supp. 936 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
Rowe v. Pittsgrove Township
379 A.2d 497 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Pascack Ass'n, Ltd. v. Mayor & Coun. Washington Tp.
379 A.2d 6 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of Madison
371 A.2d 1192 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
Bakke v. Regents of University of California
553 P.2d 1152 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
Hills v. Gautreaux
425 U.S. 284 (Supreme Court, 1976)