Gautieri v. Tuzio

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Gautieri v. Tuzio

3 R.I. Dec. 164

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedApril 26, 1927

DocketNo.68948

StatusPublished

This text of 3 R.I. Dec. 164 (Gautieri v. Tuzio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gautieri v. Tuzio, 3 R.I. Dec. 164 (R.I. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

RESCRIPT

CAPOTOSTO, J.

In an action of assumpsit plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for services rendered the defendant in taking care of certain mortgages. After a verdict for the defendant the plaintiff moves for a new trial!"

The plaintiff’s testimony is so interwoven with inconsistencies and untruths as to be unworthy of credence. In spite of the fact that this Court held the plaintiff for -perjury, it has nevertheless * scrupulously reviewed the evidence in this case. Its conclusion is that any other verdict thañ a verdict for the defendant would have put the stamp of approval upon improper conduct.

Motion for new trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RESCRIPT

CAPOTOSTO, J.

In an action of assumpsit plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for services rendered the defendant in taking care of certain mortgages. After a verdict for the defendant the plaintiff moves for a new trial!"

The plaintiff’s testimony is so interwoven with inconsistencies and untruths as to be unworthy of credence. In spite of the fact that this Court held the plaintiff for -perjury, it has nevertheless * scrupulously reviewed the evidence in this case. Its conclusion is that any other verdict thañ a verdict for the defendant would have put the stamp of approval upon improper conduct.

Motion for new trial denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 R.I. Dec. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gautieri-v-tuzio-risuperct-1927.