Gause v. Boldt

115 A.D. 897, 100 N.Y.S. 1118
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

For the reasons stated in Gause v. Boldt, No. 1, decided herewith (ante, p.-), the judgment appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom all bills of costs except one, that one to be divided among all defendants whose demurrers were sustained therein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs in this court. Present — Patterson, Ingraham, Laughlin, Houghton, and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion,, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gause v. Boldt, 115 A.D. 897, 100 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

115 A.D. 897 (Gause v. Boldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ming v. Simpkins
59 Misc. 2d 853 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Cheney v. Scharmann
145 A.D. 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Agnew
128 A.D. 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)