Gause v. . Boldt

80 N.E. 566, 188 N.Y. 546, 26 Bedell 546, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1165
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 1907·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Gurimn.

The trust company not having been dissolved and being subject to suit it was necessary for the plaintiff; to obtain a judgment • upon his olaim against it before bringing an action against its stockholders to enforce any liability on account of such claim. (Banking Law, § 162.) We do not deem it necessary or expedient at this time to express any opinion upon the effect of the other requirements of said statute which have been more or less discussed by counsel. '

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cullen, Ch. J., Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight,. Yann, Weeneb, Willaed Babtlett and Hisoook, JJ"., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gause v. . Boldt, 80 N.E. 566, 188 N.Y. 546, 26 Bedell 546, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1165 (N.Y. 1907).

80 N.E. 566 (Gause v. . Boldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ming v. Simpkins
59 Misc. 2d 853 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Eskimo Pie Corporation v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc.
266 F. Supp. 79 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Cole v. Associated Construction Co.
103 A.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1954)
Cheney v. Scharmann
145 A.D. 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Agnew
128 A.D. 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)