Gaunt v. Pittaway
546 S.E.2d 400, 353 N.C. 262, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 1004
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gaunt v. Pittaway. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 S.E.2d 401 →
Opinion
Motion by defendants (Pittaway, Crain, Whitesides, Wing, Coulam and The Nalle Clinic) to dismiss the appeal by plaintiffs (Gaunt and Center for Reproductive Medicine, P.A.) for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 21 December 2000. Petition by plaintiffs (Gaunt and Center for Reproductive Medicine, P.A.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 2000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gaunt v. Pittaway, 546 S.E.2d 400, 353 N.C. 262, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 1004 (N.C. 2000).
546 S.E.2d 400 (Gaunt v. Pittaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.