Gaulding Fertilizer Co. v. Driver
25 S.E. 922, 99 Ga. 623
This text of 25 S.E. 922 (Gaulding Fertilizer Co. v. Driver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gaulding Fertilizer Co. v. Driver, 25 S.E. 922, 99 Ga. 623 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
1. The seller of commercial fertilizers which have not been inspected as the law requires cannot maintain against the buyer an action for the price of the same.
2. There was no error in the trial of such an action in rejecting evidence tending to show that the plaintiff had made ineffectual efforts to have the fertilizers inspected.
Judgment CbffbVmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of Agriculture
171 U.S. 345 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 922, 99 Ga. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaulding-fertilizer-co-v-driver-ga-1896.