Gaulding Fertilizer Co. v. Driver
25 S.E. 922, 99 Ga. 623
Opinion
1. The seller of commercial fertilizers which have not been inspected as the law requires cannot maintain against the buyer an action for the price of the same.
2. There was no error in the trial of such an action in rejecting evidence tending to show that the plaintiff had made ineffectual efforts to have the fertilizers inspected.
Judgment CbffbVmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gaulding Fertilizer Co. v. Driver, 25 S.E. 922, 99 Ga. 623 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 922 (Gaulding Fertilizer Co. v. Driver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of Agriculture
171 U.S. 345 (Supreme Court, 1898)