Gaulden v. Mills
This text of 239 S.E.2d 353 (Gaulden v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants in this partition case sought to defend on the ground that the plaintiff acquired his interest in the land from defendants’ brother and sister (who are not parties) by fraud, undue influence and grossly inadequate consideration. The trial court struck that defense and ordered the property sold. Defendants appeal.
A defendant co-tenant cannot defeat partition on the ground that the co-tenant seeking partition acquired his interest illegally from a third person who is not a party to the case. Sewell v. Holland, 61 Ga. 608 (3) (1878).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 S.E.2d 353, 240 Ga. 4, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaulden-v-mills-ga-1977.