Gauhn v. Mills

2 Abb. N. Cas. 114
CourtNew York County Courts
DecidedMarch 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Abb. N. Cas. 114 (Gauhn v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gauhn v. Mills, 2 Abb. N. Cas. 114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1877).

Opinion

Fuller, J.

I am of opinion that upon the foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien upon premises of the owner under the statute, the court has power to direct a sale [116]*116Tby referee, as on the foreclosure of a mortgage. The last clause of section 6 of chapter 489 of Laws of 1873 is broad enough to include it. It is that the supreme court and county courts shall have full power to adjust and enforce all the rights and equities between all or any of said parties, and enforce or protect the same by any of the remedies usual in said courts.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallagher v. Karns
34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 375 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Abb. N. Cas. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gauhn-v-mills-nycountyct-1877.