Gaudoz v. Blanque

23 La. Ann. 520
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1871·No. No. 2359·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Ludeling, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale. The only question for decision is, was there sufficient authentic evidence to authorize the fiat? We think not. The act of mortgage and notes purport to be executed by Charles de Hault de Lassus as-agent of Miss Blanque. There is no proof of this agency in the record'. 12 R. 238, Dosson, curator v. Sanders; 1 R. 407; 2 An. 491.

It is therefore adjudged that the order of seizure and sale be annulled, and that the appellee pay costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaudoz v. Blanque, 23 La. Ann. 520 (La. 1871).

23 La. Ann. 520 (Gaudoz v. Blanque) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company
158 So. 2d 228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Mones
76 So. 2d 305 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)
General Finance Co. of Louisiana v. Evans
196 So. 581 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1940)
Holliday v. Logan
64 So. 277 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Bank of Leesville v. Wingate
48 So. 1005 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)