Gaudette v. Gaudette

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gaudette v. Gaudette

123 So. 3d 1176, 2013 WL 950081, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3950

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 2013

DocketNo. 4D10-2910

StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 3d 1176 (Gaudette v. Gaudette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaudette v. Gaudette, 123 So. 3d 1176, 2013 WL 950081, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3950 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mary Gaudette, appeals the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the trial court’s finding that “there was no evidence presented as to the cost of the Wife’s health insurance and if that cost would be affordable to the Husband with his limited income.” We are compelled to do so because there is evidence in the former husband’s financial affidavit that the monthly cost of appellant’s insurance was $195.00. Therefore, we direct the trial court to reconsider its findings in light of this record evidence.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN, JJ., and MORGAN, DAVID C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mary Gaudette, appeals the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the trial court’s finding that “there was no evidence presented as to the cost of the Wife’s health insurance and if that cost would be affordable to the Husband with his limited income.” We are compelled to do so because there is evidence in the former husband’s financial affidavit that the monthly cost of appellant’s insurance was $195.00. Therefore, we direct the trial court to reconsider its findings in light of this record evidence.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN, JJ., and MORGAN, DAVID C., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 3d 1176, 2013 WL 950081, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaudette-v-gaudette-fladistctapp-2013.