Gaudet v. Gaudet

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Gaudet v. Gaudet

140 So. 2d 717, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1885

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 7, 1962

DocketNo. 116

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 2d 717 (Gaudet v. Gaudet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaudet v. Gaudet, 140 So. 2d 717, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1885 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

YARRUT, Judge.

This is a suspensive appeal by the divorced wife (since remarried) from a judgment reducing a previous alimony award to her for the support of the two children adopted by her and her divorced husband-Appellee.

Appellant-wife appeared in proper person in the district court without benefit of counsel, but made no appearance here, either in proper person or through counsel; nor was a brief filed by her or in her behalf, though the case was regularly docketed and called.

After hearing a brief statement from Appellee-husband’s counsel, and reviewing the record, we find no error warranting a reversal or modification of the judgment below; hence it must be affirmed; with costs in both courts assessed against Appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YARRUT, Judge.

This is a suspensive appeal by the divorced wife (since remarried) from a judgment reducing a previous alimony award to her for the support of the two children adopted by her and her divorced husband-Appellee.

Appellant-wife appeared in proper person in the district court without benefit of counsel, but made no appearance here, either in proper person or through counsel; nor was a brief filed by her or in her behalf, though the case was regularly docketed and called.

After hearing a brief statement from Appellee-husband’s counsel, and reviewing the record, we find no error warranting a reversal or modification of the judgment below; hence it must be affirmed; with costs in both courts assessed against Appellant.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 2d 717, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaudet-v-gaudet-lactapp-1962.