Gaudet v. Dumoulin
Opinions
On the Motion to Dismiss.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The amount of the bond furnished being that, fixed by the court would sustain a devolutive, if not a suspensive-appeal. The bond is made payable to the clerk of the Civil District Court and his successor in office. It is not necessary that his name be mentioned. The date of the bond is sufficiently fixed by the recitals of the bond and its filing in the District Court. It is not claimed that the signatures to the bond are not genuine. The fact that the bond did not per se prove that fact would not be a ground for dismissal.
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
22 So. 622 (Gaudet v. Dumoulin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.