Gauchi v. Round Hill Dairy, Inc.

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 14, 3 Conn. Supp. 14, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 82
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 8, 1935
DocketFile #48329
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 14 (Gauchi v. Round Hill Dairy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gauchi v. Round Hill Dairy, Inc., 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 14, 3 Conn. Supp. 14, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 82 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

INGLIS, J.

This action was instituted by the service of process on the defendant on August 22, 1935 and was returnable to the first Tuesday of September. The plea in abatement was filed on September 3rd.

At the time the plea in abatement was filed there was pending in the Court of Common Pleas an action on the same cause of action between the parties instituted on June 30, 193?. Whether or not that action was ineffectual because of the limited jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas, it is not necessary to decide. In that action, on September 27, 193? and before the trial of the plea in abatement to the present action, the plaintiff filed a withdrawal of action.

*15 That withdrawal was filed as a matter of right under Sec. 6494, General Statutes, Revision 1930, and operated to terminate the action on the date upon which it was filed.

The modern and better rule is that even though a former action is pending at the institution of a second action, if that former action is terminated at any time prior to the hearing on a plea in abatement in the second action, the former action does not abate the second action.

1. R.C.L. 11 (Abatement Sec. 2).

1. C.J. (Abatement Sec. 132).

Manufacturers Bottle Co. vs. Taylor Stites Glass Co., Mass., 593; 95 G. S. 103.

The plea in abatement is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Budny, No. Cv 96 0070449 (Nov. 18, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9025 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Wintonbury Associates v. Kbm, Corp., No. Sph9502-79772bl (Mar. 3, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2547-H (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Parsons v. the Conn. Light and Power Co., No. Cv 94 0066077 (Jan. 25, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 376 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Blythe v. Rupf
6 Conn. Super. Ct. 195 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1938)
Blythe v. Rupf
6 Conn. Supp. 195 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 14, 3 Conn. Supp. 14, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gauchi-v-round-hill-dairy-inc-connsuperct-1935.