Gaubert v. Coe
122 F.2d 959, 74 App. D.C. 397, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3126
This text of 122 F.2d 959 (Gaubert v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gaubert v. Coe, 122 F.2d 959, 74 App. D.C. 397, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3126 (D.C. Cir. 1941).
Opinion
We agree with the Patent Office and the District Court that appellants are not entitled to the relief sought and that their complaint was properly dismissed.
Affirmed.
GRONER, Chief Justice, took no part in the decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 F.2d 959, 74 App. D.C. 397, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaubert-v-coe-cadc-1941.