GATX Flightlease Aircraft Co. v. Airbus S.A.S

40 A.D.3d 445, 834 N.Y.S.2d 659

This text of 40 A.D.3d 445 (GATX Flightlease Aircraft Co. v. Airbus S.A.S) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GATX Flightlease Aircraft Co. v. Airbus S.A.S, 40 A.D.3d 445, 834 N.Y.S.2d 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered January 9, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court correctly found that the issue of the collateral estoppel effect to be given a Cayman Islands judgment was governed by Cayman law (see e.g. Watts v Swiss Bank Corp., 27 NY2d 270, 275 [1970]; Weiss v La Suisse, Societe D’Assurances Sur La Vie, 293 F Supp 2d 397, 405 [SD NY 2003]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30646(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiss v. La Suisse, Societe D'Assurances
293 F. Supp. 2d 397 (S.D. New York, 2003)
Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp.
265 N.E.2d 739 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 445, 834 N.Y.S.2d 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatx-flightlease-aircraft-co-v-airbus-sas-nyappdiv-2007.