Gatton v. First Federal Savings Bank of Florida

923 So. 2d 1260, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4296, 2006 WL 757798
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-5244
StatusPublished

This text of 923 So. 2d 1260 (Gatton v. First Federal Savings Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gatton v. First Federal Savings Bank of Florida, 923 So. 2d 1260, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4296, 2006 WL 757798 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellants’ renewed motion to transfer venue. Proper venue lies either in Alachua County (as. appellants’ county of residence or principal place of business), or in Columbia County (as the place where the action accrued because the promissory note provided for payment to be made at appellee’s Lake City offices). See §§ 47.011, .051, Fla. Stat. (2004); Carter v. Fleming, 567 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Because venue does not lie in Su-wannee County, the trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion for change of venue. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Fleming
567 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 So. 2d 1260, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4296, 2006 WL 757798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatton-v-first-federal-savings-bank-of-florida-fladistctapp-2006.