Gatto v. FLA. PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
This text of 415 So. 2d 869 (Gatto v. FLA. PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Edward GATTO, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Robert E. Gatto, pro se.
Catherine L. Dickson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.
MILLS, Judge.
Gatto appeals the Commission's refusal to review his original scoring following his biennial reinterview. We affirm.
The reinterview is not an excuse to relitigate the establishment of a presumptive parole release date.
There was no ex post facto violation, Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 So. 2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatto-v-fla-parole-and-probation-comn-fladistctapp-1982.