Gatlin v. State, Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gatlin v. State, Department of Transportation

763 So. 2d 1232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6808, 2000 WL 718178

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-1097

StatusPublished

This text of 763 So. 2d 1232 (Gatlin v. State, Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gatlin v. State, Department of Transportation, 763 So. 2d 1232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6808, 2000 WL 718178 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judge Ray Gatlin and Gerra Gatlin appeal an order denying attorney fees, which they sought on the authority of section 73.092(2), Florida Statutes (1997), for legal services performed in connection with an unsuccessful administrative proceeding by which appellants sought to revoke certain environmental permits granted to the state in furtherance of an eminent domain action. Because, on the facts of this record, we conclude that the administrative proceeding here was not an integral part of either the eminent domain or the inverse condemnation proceeding relating to ap[1233]*1233pellant’s property, see State, Dep’t of Transp. v. Beta Developers, Inc., 554 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Schick v. Florida, Dep’t of Agriculture and Consumer Servs., 586 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the administrative proceeding was not a “supplemental proceeding” under section 73.092(2). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of an attorney’s fee.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK AND BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judge Ray Gatlin and Gerra Gatlin appeal an order denying attorney fees, which they sought on the authority of section 73.092(2), Florida Statutes (1997), for legal services performed in connection with an unsuccessful administrative proceeding by which appellants sought to revoke certain environmental permits granted to the state in furtherance of an eminent domain action. Because, on the facts of this record, we conclude that the administrative proceeding here was not an integral part of either the eminent domain or the inverse condemnation proceeding relating to ap[1233]*1233pellant’s property, see State, Dep’t of Transp. v. Beta Developers, Inc., 554 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Schick v. Florida, Dep’t of Agriculture and Consumer Servs., 586 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the administrative proceeding was not a “supplemental proceeding” under section 73.092(2). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of an attorney’s fee.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK AND BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 1232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6808, 2000 WL 718178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatlin-v-state-department-of-transportation-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack