Gatlin v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities

1995 Ohio 90, 74 Ohio St. 3d 2
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1995·No. 1993-2498·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 2.]

GATLIN, APPELLEE, v. STARK COUNTY BOARD OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, APPELLANT. [Cite as Gatlin v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities, 1995-Ohio-90.] Employment relations—Race and handicap discrimination—R.C. 4112.99 is a remedial statute and is subject to R.C. 2305.07's six-year limitation period. (No. 93-2498—Submitted September 27, 1995—Decided October 18, 1995.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. CA-9274. _________________ Vincent Gatlin, pro se. Robert D. Horowitz, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, David A. Thorley, Assistant Chief, Civil Division, and Kristen Bates Aylward, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 281, 638 N.E.2d 991. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. WRIGHT, J., dissents. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gatlin v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities, 1995 Ohio 90, 74 Ohio St. 3d 2 (Ohio 1995).

1995 Ohio 90 (Gatlin v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.
638 N.E.2d 991 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc.
1994 Ohio 295 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)