Gatlin v. Peacock
This text of 69 S.E. 913 (Gatlin v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing a continuance to the defendant.
2. In an action of complaint for land by the widow of a vendee against the vendor in possession, profert in evidence of a deed from the vendor to the vendee, conveying the premises, and testimony that the plaintiff is the widow and sole heir at law of the vendee, who died leaving no debts and upon whose estate there is no administration, makes out a prima facie case for the plaintiff. Powell on Actions for Land, § 384. Civil Code § 3355.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 S.E. 913, 135 Ga. 582, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatlin-v-peacock-ga-1911.