Gatlin v. Daigle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Gatlin v. Daigle

72 So. 2d 654, 1954 La. App. LEXIS 751

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 26, 1954

DocketNo. 3845

StatusPublished

This text of 72 So. 2d 654 (Gatlin v. Daigle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gatlin v. Daigle, 72 So. 2d 654, 1954 La. App. LEXIS 751 (La. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

LOTTINGER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Rhea v. Daigle, La.App., 72 So.2d 643, the judgment appealed from is reversed insofar as Edgar J. Hebert and the Maryland Casualty Company are concerned and the plaintiffs’ suit against them dismissed. As Robert Daigle and Gaston Daigle have made no appearance in this court, the judgment against them cannot be modified and same stands affirmed.

- Judgment amended and as amended affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOTTINGER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Rhea v. Daigle, La.App., 72 So.2d 643, the judgment appealed from is reversed insofar as Edgar J. Hebert and the Maryland Casualty Company are concerned and the plaintiffs’ suit against them dismissed. As Robert Daigle and Gaston Daigle have made no appearance in this court, the judgment against them cannot be modified and same stands affirmed.

- Judgment amended and as amended affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 So. 2d 654, 1954 La. App. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatlin-v-daigle-lactapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack