Gath v. St. Lucie County-Fort Pierce Fire District

640 So. 2d 138, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7423, 1994 WL 386579
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1994·No. No. 92-1931·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

MAY, MELANIE G., Associate Judge.

Reminiscent of a first year law school torts exam, this case presents the proverbial issues of duty and proximate cause. In its simplest terms, the issue is whether the negligent initiation of a false alarm can render a party liable for accidents involving emergency vehicles responding to the alarm. We agree with the trial court’s decision in this case that the law does not support the extension of liability to the facts of this ease. See Department of Transp. v. Anglin, 502 So.2d 896 (Fla.1987); and Ford v. Peaches Entertainment Corp., 83 N.C.App. 155, 349 S.E.2d 82 (1986), review denied, 318 N.C. 694, 351 S.E.2d 746 (1987).

We, therefore, affirm the summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

GUNTHER, J., concurs. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gath v. St. Lucie County-Fort Pierce Fire District, 640 So. 2d 138, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7423, 1994 WL 386579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 138 (Gath v. St. Lucie County-Fort Pierce Fire District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Litowsky v. ASCO Power Technologies, L.P.
4 F. Supp. 3d 328 (D. Massachusetts, 2014)
Sell v. Sell
882 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Smith v. Florida Power and Light Co.
857 So. 2d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Shepard v. Reinoehl
830 A.2d 1235 (Superior Court of Delaware, 2002)