Gateway Prop. v. Dept. of Community Affairs

960 So. 2d 771, 2007 WL 1266157
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2007
Docket3D06-1718
StatusPublished

This text of 960 So. 2d 771 (Gateway Prop. v. Dept. of Community Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gateway Prop. v. Dept. of Community Affairs, 960 So. 2d 771, 2007 WL 1266157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

960 So.2d 771 (2007)

GATEWAY SOUTHEAST PROPERTIES, INC., and City of Doral, Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, TOWN OF MEDLEY, and Waste Management, Inc. of Florida, Appellees.

No. 3D06-1718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 2, 2007.
Rehearing and Rehearing Denied August 2, 2007.

*772 Shubin & Bass and Elaine D. Walter and Jeffrey S. Bass, and Lucinda A. Hofmann; John J. Hearn, Miami; Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol and Michael D. Cirullo, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Roth, Rousso & Katsman and Barbara J. Riesberg; White & Case and Douglas M. Halsey and Evan M. Goldenberg and Mark B. Martinez; Richard E. Shine, Miami, for appellees.

Before GREEN and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 2, 2007.

We reverse the Summary Final Order of the Division of Administrative Hearings, determining that the Town of Medley's Ordinance C-306 is consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance C-306 permits expansion of a non-conforming use, which the Comprehensive Plan destined to be phased out. This violates the Florida Growth Management Act's dictates that local plans be "implemented through the adoption of land development regulations that are consistent with the plan." Bd. of County Comm'rs of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So.2d 469, 473 (Fla. 1993)(emphasis added); § 163.3202, Fla. Stat. (2006). Here, as the Ordinance unequivocally "deviates or departs" from the parameters of the Plan, Machado v. Musgrove, 519 So.2d 629, 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we cannot hold that it is consistent. See City of Miami Beach v. Chisholm Props. S. Beach, Inc., 830 So.2d 842, 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring).

We therefore reverse the Summary Final Order and remand with instructions to grant Gateway's Motion for Summary Final Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Miami Beach v. CHISHOLM PROP. SOUTH BEACH, INC.
830 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
MacHado v. Musgrove
519 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF BREVARD v. Snyder
627 So. 2d 469 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
960 So. 2d 771, 2007 WL 1266157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gateway-prop-v-dept-of-community-affairs-fladistctapp-2007.