Gates v. Yeager

498 S.E.2d 372, 232 Ga. App. 91, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1866, 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 585
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 6, 1998
DocketA98A1491
StatusPublished

This text of 498 S.E.2d 372 (Gates v. Yeager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gates v. Yeager, 498 S.E.2d 372, 232 Ga. App. 91, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1866, 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 585 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

McMüRRAY, Presiding Judge.

Roy Gates, a Georgia prison inmate, commenced this civil action against the Sheriff of Coweta County and the Warden of Calhoun State Prison, over their failure to protect him from the attack of other inmates. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants on December 31, 1997, and Gates filed this pro se direct appeal on January 13, 1998.

Under OCGA § 42-12-8, the discretionary appeal procedures pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 are required in all appeals brought by inmates in civil actions. Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Gates’s failure to comply with those requisite discretionary procedures deprives this Court of the jurisdiction to consider this case, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Blackburn and Eldridge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Townsend
480 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 S.E.2d 372, 232 Ga. App. 91, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1866, 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-yeager-gactapp-1998.