Gates v. Parmly

Supreme Court

Gates v. Parmly

191 U.S. 557, 24 S. Ct. 843

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 26, 1903

DocketNo. 37

StatusPublished

This text of 191 U.S. 557 (Gates v. Parmly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gates v. Parmly, 191 U.S. 557, 24 S. Ct. 843 (1903).

Pincite

Opinion

In error to the Circuit Court of Clark County, State of Wisconsin.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Knox v. Exchange Bank, 12 Wall. 379; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Morley v. Lake Shore &c. Railway Company, 146 U. S. 162; Bacon [558]*558v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207.

Mr. Bvhlee A. Cole for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton for defendants in- error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In error to the Circuit Court of Clark County, State of Wisconsin.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Knox v. Exchange Bank, 12 Wall. 379; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Morley v. Lake Shore &c. Railway Company, 146 U. S. 162; Bacon [558]*558v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207.

Mr. Bvhlee A. Cole for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton for defendants in- error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 U.S. 557, 24 S. Ct. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-parmly-scotus-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack