Gates v. McDaniel
This text of 89 F. App'x 645 (Gates v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
VACATED and REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir.2003) (“[W]e join the ‘growing consensus’ in recognizing the clear appropriateness of a stay when valid claims would otherwise be forfeited.”).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 F. App'x 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-mcdaniel-ca9-2004.