Gates v. Life Insurance Co.

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 365
CourtOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati
DecidedJuly 1, 1923
DocketNo. 58792
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 365 (Gates v. Life Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gates v. Life Insurance Co., 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 365 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1923).

Opinion

MARX, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This was an action on an insurance policy. Cleo Gates took out an insurance policy in the sum of $1,000, making her husband, William Gates, beneficiary. The policy provided for quarterly payment of premiums on the 2nd of February, May, August and November of each year for a period of 20 years. The premiums for the first two quarters were paid, but the premium for the third quarter, due Aug. 2, 1921, was not paid. The insured, Cleo Gates, died seven days later, on Aug. 9, 1921. Thereafter he tendered payment of the overdue premium, which the Insurance Company refused to accept.

At the request of the company Gates furnished proofs of the death, but it refused payment- of its policy. Plaintiff claimed that the insured was entitled to 30 days’ grace within which to pay the premium for the third quarter. The company claimed that the policy provided for a period of grace only after the payment of all premiums for the first year. In rendering a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the Court held:

1. The provision of a policy of life insurance limiting the commencement of the period of grace until after the payment of all premiums, for the first “year” is in conflict with 9420-2 GC., which provides for a grace of one month for the payment of all pem'iuma after the “first” and is therefore invalid.

2. The word “premium” as used in 9420-2 GC., does not necessarily mean Annual Premium, but is the consideration paid for insurance for a stated period, whether such premium is paid quarterly, semi-annually, annually or for such other period as the parties may determine in accordance with the intention expressed in the policy or contract of insurance.

3. Where the intention of a policy of insur-anee is to provide for quarterly premiums' and the premium1 for the first quarter is paid such payment constitutes a payment of the first premium within the meaning of 9420-2 GC. and the insured is entitled to a grace or-one month within which to pay the premiums for all subsequent quarters.

4. Where the insured after paying the premiums for the first and second quarters under a limited payment life policy, failed to pay the premium for the third quarter of the first year on the date due and died within one month from said date, her beneficiary upon tendering the premium for such third quarter during the period of grace is entitled to recover the proceeds of the policy, less the overdue quarterly premium.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ohio Law. Abs. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-life-insurance-co-ohsuperctcinci-1923.