Gates v. Johnston Lumber Co.
52 N.E. 736, 172 Mass. 495, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 830
Opinion
It is not alleged that the entry by the defendant for the purpose of removing its own property will do the plaintiff any harm beyond a purely technical trespass, nor that the defendant is not able to pay the plaintiff any damages which she may recover, nor that the plaintiff cannot prevent the trouble by removing the bricks from her land. She has no right to appropriate them because they were not removed within the time allowed at the sale. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gates v. Johnston Lumber Co., 52 N.E. 736, 172 Mass. 495, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 830 (Mass. 1899).
52 N.E. 736 (Gates v. Johnston Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levine v. Black
44 N.E.2d 774 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Oesting v. City of New Bedford
96 N.E. 1095 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)