Gates v. Arreaza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gates v. Arreaza

35 A.D.3d 1150, 825 N.Y.S.2d 399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.D.3d 1150 (Gates v. Arreaza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gates v. Arreaza, 35 A.D.3d 1150, 825 N.Y.S.2d 399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered January 27, 2004. The order, among other things, determined that certain funds held by plaintiff are wages due and payable to individual defendants with a preference in payment before any other creditors and that the commissions, expenses and administrative costs of plaintiff are chargeable against all funds received and disbursed by plaintiff, including the funds payable to individual defendants.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing the appeal and cross appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed August 7, 2006, and the statement relating to discontinuance of the appeal and cross appeal signed by Maurice J. Vaughn, defendant-respondent pro se, on December 13, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal be and the same hereby are dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

All concur, Lawton, J., not participating. Present—Green, J.P, Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered January 27, 2004. The order, among other things, determined that certain funds held by plaintiff are wages due and payable to individual defendants with a preference in payment before any other creditors and that the commissions, expenses and administrative costs of plaintiff are chargeable against all funds received and disbursed by plaintiff, including the funds payable to individual defendants.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing the appeal and cross appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed August 7, 2006, and the statement relating to discontinuance of the appeal and cross appeal signed by Maurice J. Vaughn, defendant-respondent pro se, on December 13, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal be and the same hereby are dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

All concur, Lawton, J., not participating. Present—Green, J.P, Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A.D.3d 1150, 825 N.Y.S.2d 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-arreaza-nyappdiv-2006.