Gates, Paul D. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 5, 2013
Docket05-11-00404-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gates, Paul D. v. State (Gates, Paul D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gates, Paul D. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

RECEIVED r.ntior OF APPEALS

JUN 0 7 2013

t**»«r**»», ««.}» N/»^}RtGT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NO. WR-79,045-01

EX PARTE PAUL DOUGLAS GATES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-1045830-L IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 5 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk ofthe trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Exparte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to forty-five years' imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Gates v. State, No. 05-11-00404-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.).

Applicant contends that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to advise him of his right to file a petition for discretionary review (PDR) and to timely notify

him that his conviction had been affirmed. We remanded this application to the trial court for

findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial courtmade findings and conclusions and recommendedthat we grantApplicantan

out-of-time PDR. Weagree. On this record, there was a breakdown in the system. Exparte Riley,

193 S.W.3d 900,902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find that Applicant is entitledto the opportunity

to file an out-of-time PDR of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in case number 05-11-

00404-CR that affirmed his conviction in cause number F-l 045830-L from Criminal District Court

No. 5 of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court

within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.

Delivered: June 5,2013 Do not publish OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS RO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION PENALTY FOR PITNEY BOWES AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 PRIVATE USE 02 1R $ 00 384 0002003152 JUN05 2013 MAILED FROM ZIPCOOE 78701 WR-79,045-01 St?0FAPPE"-S CLERK SB DQU-N3B 7S202 ir##t^^lW^##W(J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gates, Paul D. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-paul-d-v-state-texapp-2013.