Gately v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Gately v. State

187 S.W.3d 856, 357 Ark. 648, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 381

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 10, 2004

DocketCR 04-583

StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.W.3d 856 (Gately v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gately v. State, 187 S.W.3d 856, 357 Ark. 648, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 381 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Helen Marie Gately, by and through her attorney, am. filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

Her attorney, John R. VanWinkle, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Helen Marie Gately, by and through her attorney, am. filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

Her attorney, John R. VanWinkle, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 S.W.3d 856, 357 Ark. 648, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gately-v-state-ark-2004.