Gately v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gately v. City of New York

277 A.D.2d 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 903 (Gately v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gately v. City of New York, 277 A.D.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, claimed to have been sustained by plaintiffs by reason of the negligence of defendants in failing to give adequate warning of the presence of a wall erected by the defendant railroad company across part of a public highway in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York, and in which defendants filed cross complaints, defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered on the verdict of a jury, and which dismissed their respective cross complaints. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, claimed to have been sustained by plaintiffs by reason of the negligence of defendants in failing to give adequate warning of the presence of a wall erected by the defendant railroad company across part of a public highway in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York, and in which defendants filed cross complaints, defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered on the verdict of a jury, and which dismissed their respective cross complaints. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gately-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.