Gate City Dairy & Ice Cream Co. v. McRae
This text of 139 S.E. 542 (Gate City Dairy & Ice Cream Co. v. McRae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence was sufficient to prove the allegations of the petition, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a nonsuit.
2. It is’not a good criticism of an instruction to the jury, which states a correct principle of law applicable to the case, that the judge did not in that connection charge more elaborately on the subject, or charge upon some other principle of law applicable to the case.
3. Where an instruction to the jury, stating a correct principle of law, is excepted to upon the ground that it is not authorized by the evidence, a reversal will not be required unless the iristruction in the light of the charge as a whole is confusing and calculated to mislead the jury on a material issue in the ease.
4. The exceptions to the charge in this case show no cause for a reversal.
5. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.
New Trial, 29 Cyc. p. 824, n. 41.
Trial, 38 Cyc. p. 1558, n. 26, 30; p. 1617, :i. 34; p. 1622, n. 45, 46; p. 1778, n. 73; p. 1779, n. 75.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 542, 164 Ga. 810, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gate-city-dairy-ice-cream-co-v-mcrae-ga-1927.