Gaston v. State

72 S.E. 285, 9 Ga. App. 824, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 351
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 10, 1911
Docket3564
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 S.E. 285 (Gaston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaston v. State, 72 S.E. 285, 9 Ga. App. 824, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. The evidence, though somewhat weak and circumstantial, is not legally insufficient to support the verdict.

2. While the accused in a criminal case, in making his statement to the jury, has the right to state that he has received a certain letter, and to state its contents, it is not error for the court to refuse to allow him to make profert of the letter without proof of its genuineness, or, without such proof, to allow him to introduce the letter as a part of his statement. Woodard v. State, 5 Ga. App. 447 (63 S. E. 573), and. cases therein cited.

3. The testimony objected to as being a mere proposition of compromise was not objectionable as such.

4. No material error appears. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. State
120 S.E.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Calhoun v. State
117 S.E. 771 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 285, 9 Ga. App. 824, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaston-v-state-gactapp-1911.