Gaston v. State

664 So. 2d 1063, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12608, 1995 WL 700368
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gaston v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 613 So. 2d 496
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1995·No. No. 94-03670·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm Richard C. Gaston’s conviction for aggravated stalking, but we strike certain aspects of the probationary conditions not orally pronounced at sentencing: the second sentence of condition 4 relating to weapons, and the portion of condition 7 relating to excessive use of intoxicants. See Hart v. State, 651 So.2d 112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Furthermore, the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), must be stricken. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaston v. State, 664 So. 2d 1063, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12608, 1995 WL 700368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 1063 (Gaston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. State
651 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)