Gaston v. State

664 So. 2d 1063, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12608, 1995 WL 700368
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1995
DocketNo. 94-03670
StatusPublished

This text of 664 So. 2d 1063 (Gaston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaston v. State, 664 So. 2d 1063, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12608, 1995 WL 700368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm Richard C. Gaston’s conviction for aggravated stalking, but we strike certain aspects of the probationary conditions not orally pronounced at sentencing: the second sentence of condition 4 relating to weapons, and the portion of condition 7 relating to excessive use of intoxicants. See Hart v. State, 651 So.2d 112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Furthermore, the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), must be stricken. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. State
651 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 So. 2d 1063, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12608, 1995 WL 700368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaston-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.