Gastelum v. Cotton On USA, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-01194-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 13 | COTTON ON USA, INC., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendant. (ECF No. 33) 15 16 On February 19, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice. 17 In light of the stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)@i); Wilson 18 v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed pursuant to the 19 terms of the stipulation. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close the file in this case and 21 adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). 22 23 | IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Dated: _ February 20, 2025 5 United States Magistrate Judge 6 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gastelum v. Cotton On USA, Inc. (Gastelum v. Cotton On USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.