Gasque v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Gasque v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

607 F. App'x 327

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 24, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1121

StatusPublished

This text of 607 F. App'x 327 (Gasque v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gasque v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 607 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charmaine K. Gasque appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Gasque’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gasque v. Commissioner, No. 4:13-cv-03141-MGL, 2015 WL 366434 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2015). We deny as moot the motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charmaine K. Gasque appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Gasque’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gasque v. Commissioner, No. 4:13-cv-03141-MGL, 2015 WL 366434 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2015). We deny as moot the motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

607 F. App'x 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gasque-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-ca4-2015.