Gasparik v. Gelman Sciences & Travelers

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gasparik v. Gelman Sciences & Travelers

846 So. 2d 635, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7968, 2003 WL 21227973

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 2003

DocketNo. 1D02-4418

StatusPublished

This text of 846 So. 2d 635 (Gasparik v. Gelman Sciences & Travelers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gasparik v. Gelman Sciences & Travelers, 846 So. 2d 635, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7968, 2003 WL 21227973 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction in this matter to the Judge of Compensation Claims with directions to conduct a hearing and make findings of fact concerning the question of whether appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed. Based on the findings made by the lower tribunal, we conclude that this court’s jurisdiction was not timely invoked, and therefore dismiss the appeal. [636]*636Because no timely notice of appeal was filed and the notice of cross-appeal was not filed within 30 days of rendition of the order identified therein, the cross-appeal is likewise dismissed.

APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C. J., WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction in this matter to the Judge of Compensation Claims with directions to conduct a hearing and make findings of fact concerning the question of whether appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed. Based on the findings made by the lower tribunal, we conclude that this court’s jurisdiction was not timely invoked, and therefore dismiss the appeal. [636]*636Because no timely notice of appeal was filed and the notice of cross-appeal was not filed within 30 days of rendition of the order identified therein, the cross-appeal is likewise dismissed.

APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C. J., WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 So. 2d 635, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7968, 2003 WL 21227973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gasparik-v-gelman-sciences-travelers-fladistctapp-2003.