Gaspar, Ex Parte Felipe Rubio
This text of Gaspar, Ex Parte Felipe Rubio (Gaspar, Ex Parte Felipe Rubio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. AP-76,313 & AP-76,314
EX PARTE FELIPE RUBIO GASPAR, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 22481-A AND 22386-A IN THE 336 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM FANNIN COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary
of a habitation and aggravated assault and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment for the burglary
of a habitation, and twenty years’ imprisonment for the aggravated assault. His direct appeals were
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Gaspar v. State, Nos. 06-08-00209-CR and 06-08-00207-CR
(Tex. App. – Texarkana, October 22, 2008). 2
Applicant contends that he was denied the opportunity to appeal these convictions because
no timely notice of appeal was filed in either case. We remanded these applications to the trial court
for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal due to a
breakdown in the legal system as a whole, and that the error is not directly attributable to either trial
or appellate counsel. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-
of-time appeal of the judgments of conviction in Cause Nos. 22481-A and 22386-A from the 336th
Judicial District Court of Fannin County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may
give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful
appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentences had been imposed on the date on which
the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he
must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the
mandate of this Court issues.
Delivered: March 17, 2010 Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gaspar, Ex Parte Felipe Rubio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaspar-ex-parte-felipe-rubio-texcrimapp-2010.