Gaskins v. Woodruff

233 So. 2d 403, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6663
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1970
DocketNo. 69-511
StatusPublished

This text of 233 So. 2d 403 (Gaskins v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaskins v. Woodruff, 233 So. 2d 403, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6663 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant filed a general petition to review a costs’ judgment entered following plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal. The judgment allowed as costs only certain of the items sought by defendant. This petition should be and is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari. City of Hallandale v. Chatios, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 53. Upon review thereof and no abuse of the trial judge’s discretion being demonstrated, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CROSS, C. J„ and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Hallandale v. Chatlos
211 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 So. 2d 403, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaskins-v-woodruff-fladistctapp-1970.