Gaskins v. Woodruff
This text of 233 So. 2d 403 (Gaskins v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant filed a general petition to review a costs’ judgment entered following plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal. The judgment allowed as costs only certain of the items sought by defendant. This petition should be and is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari. City of Hallandale v. Chatios, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 53. Upon review thereof and no abuse of the trial judge’s discretion being demonstrated, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 So. 2d 403, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaskins-v-woodruff-fladistctapp-1970.