Gaskins v. Woodruff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gaskins v. Woodruff

233 So. 2d 403, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6663

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1970·No. No. 69-511·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant filed a general petition to review a costs’ judgment entered following plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal. The judgment allowed as costs only certain of the items sought by defendant. This petition should be and is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari. City of Hallandale v. Chatios, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 53. Upon review thereof and no abuse of the trial judge’s discretion being demonstrated, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CROSS, C. J„ and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant filed a general petition to review a costs’ judgment entered following plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal. The judgment allowed as costs only certain of the items sought by defendant. This petition should be and is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari. City of Hallandale v. Chatios, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 53. Upon review thereof and no abuse of the trial judge’s discretion being demonstrated, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CROSS, C. J„ and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Gaskins v. Woodruff, 233 So. 2d 403, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6663 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

233 So. 2d 403 (Gaskins v. Woodruff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related