Gaskins v. United States

466 F. App'x 4
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2012
DocketNo. 08-3011
StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 4 (Gaskins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaskins v. United States, 466 F. App'x 4 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties, the record from the district court, and the oral arguments presented on April 24, 2012, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of conviction be REVERSED, and the matter remanded to the district court for entry of a judgment of acquittal. A reasonable juror could not have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant knowingly participated in the conspiracy with the intent to commit the offense of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute narcotics. U.S. v. Carson, 455 F.3d 336, 366 (D.C.Cir.2006); United States v. Gatling, 96 F.3d 1511, 1518 (D.C.Cir.1996); see Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 79 S.Ct. 1314, 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959). An opinion will follow in due course.

The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this judgment in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ingram v. United States
360 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1959)
United States v. Carson, Samuel
455 F.3d 336 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Jennifer Juliet Gatling
96 F.3d 1511 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaskins-v-united-states-cadc-2012.