Gaskins v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gaskins v. State

160 S.E. 426, 173 Ga. 372, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 317

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 17, 1931·No. No. 8015·Published

Opinion

'Tliis ease came to the Supreme Court on a writ of error to the overruling of a motion for new trial; and being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, Beck, P. J., and Hill and Gilbert, JJ., being of the opinion that the judgment should'be affirmed, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hines, Jj., being of the contrary view, the judgment of the trial court : stands affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

'Tliis ease came to the Supreme Court on a writ of error to the overruling of a motion for new trial; and being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, Beck, P. J., and Hill and Gilbert, JJ., being of the opinion that the judgment should'be affirmed, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hines, Jj., being of the contrary view, the judgment of the trial court : stands affirmed by operation of law.

Gaskins v. State, 160 S.E. 426, 173 Ga. 372, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 317 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

160 S.E. 426 (Gaskins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.