Gaskins v. Ross

District Court, N.D. Indiana·Decided April 19, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00328·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

JENNAH M. GASKINS,

Plaintiff,

v. CAUSE NO.: 2:20-CV-328-TLS-JEM

TIMOTHY F. ROSS, AMERITRANS GROUP, INC., OC TRANSPORTATION, INC., and THE MASON AND DIXON LINES INCORPORATED a/k/a UNIVERSAL INTERMODAL SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Stipulation to Dismiss [ECF No. 30], filed on April 7, 2021. Therein, the parties seek to dismiss without prejudice the claims against Defendant The Mason and Dixon Lines Incorporated a/k/a Universal Intermodal Services, Inc.1 Although not specified, as every party who has appeared signed the Stipulation, it appears to fall under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). However, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the proper procedure for dismissal of individual parties or claims is by amending the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) and not by dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857–58, 858 n.9 (7th Cir. 2015) (explaining that “Rule 15(a) allows a plaintiff to amend his complaint—including by adding or dropping parties and claims—as a matter of right in some situations and by court order in others” and reminding district courts to

1 The Stipulation refers to these entities separately. However, the current Complaint governs, and so the Court refers to a single entity – The Mason and Dixon Lines Incorporated a/k/a Universal Intermodal Services, Inc. use Rule 15(a) rather than Rule 41(a) for dismissal of individual claims); see also 6 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1479 (3d ed.). Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the Stipulation to Dismiss [ECF No. 30]. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), the Court GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to file, on or before May 3, 2021, an amended complaint to drop Defendant The Mason and Dixon Lines Incorporated a/k/a Universal Intermodal Services, Inc. as a party. SO ORDERED on April 19, 2021. s/ Theresa L. Springmann JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaskins v. Ross, (N.D. Ind. 2021).

Gaskins v. Ross (Gaskins v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Taylor, Jr. v. James Brown
787 F.3d 851 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)