Gaskins v. . Lancaster
Opinion
after stating the case: Was it error, upon a volte face by defendant, to refuse to undo in May what was done at his instance in February? The defendant invokes the sanction applied in Thompson v. Funeral Home, 208 N. C., 178, 179 S. E., 801. Plaintiff relies upon the doctrine announced in Rand v. Gillette, 199 N. C., 462, 154 S. E., 746. The motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
183 S.E. 364 (Gaskins v. . Lancaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.